Same-day Filing
Instant Bank Account
No Hidden Fees
Get trusted, attorney-built systems without the law firm.

By The Wyoming LLC Attorney Team

Home

    Anonymous Holding Company in Indiana

    Summary

    Indiana does not require member or manager names in its own public LLC filing. Indiana's own Articles of Organization already keep every name off the public record — there's no organizer or governing-person field the way Colorado or Georgia have. A Wyoming parent above an Indiana LLC is mainly an asset-protection upgrade, given Indiana's unresolved single-member charging-order question. See our Wyoming holding company guide and full list of anonymous LLC states for more.

    $95

    Articles of Organization filing fee (online)

    No names required

    Member, manager, and organizer disclosure all optional

    $32

    Biennial Business Entity Report (every 2 years)

    Unsettled

    Charging-order exclusivity for single-member LLCs

    Does Indiana Allow Anonymous LLC Formation?

    Indiana is one of the more privacy-friendly states in this series on its own filing, and it's worth being direct about that: the Articles of Organization ($95) require only the LLC's name, registered office, and registered agent — no organizer, member, or manager name at all — and the biennial Business Entity Report that follows makes governing-person disclosure optional rather than mandatory. What Indiana doesn't offer is settled asset protection: IC 23-18-6-7 contains no exclusive-remedy language, and the one case addressing the charging order, Brant v. Krilich, never reached a single-member fact pattern. A Wyoming holding LLC above an Indiana operating LLC is mainly used to resolve that open question, not to fix a privacy gap Indiana doesn't have.

    Indiana's Articles of Organization, filed through INBiz, require only the LLC's name, the street address of its registered office, and its registered agent's name — the statute doesn't ask for a business purpose, an organizer's name, or any member or manager information at all. Indiana is more privacy-friendly than most states on its own filing: the biennial Business Entity Report that follows makes governing-person disclosure optional as well, not mandatory, so you can leave that section blank and stay in good standing.

    Start Your Business

    Pairing Indiana With a Wyoming Holding Company

    Indiana is an unusual case in this series: its own Articles of Organization ask for nothing but the LLC name, registered office, and registered agent, so there's no member/manager field for a Wyoming holding LLC to occupy the way there is in a disclosure state, and there's no organizer-name requirement either, unlike Colorado or Georgia. Where a Wyoming parent earns its keep above an Indiana LLC is twofold: it keeps the biennial Business Entity Report's optional governing-person fields from ever needing a personal name (leave them blank, or list the Wyoming entity if you complete them), and it adds real asset-protection value, since Indiana's own charging-order exclusivity for single-member LLCs is a genuinely unresolved legal question — IC 23-18-6-7 contains no "exclusive remedy" language, and the one case on point, Brant v. Krilich, addressed only a multi-member LLC.

    Indiana not requiring member or manager names doesn't change federal law: beneficial owners of the Indiana LLC — and of any Wyoming holding LLC above it — must still be reported to FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act, which is not open to public search.

    Charging Order Protection & Ongoing Compliance

    IC 23-18-6-7; Brant v. Krilich, 835 N.E.2d 582 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005)charging order available, but exclusivity for single-member LLCs is a genuinely unresolved legal question. IC 23-18-6-7 limits a judgment creditor to a charging order with assignee-style rights, but the statute contains no "exclusive remedy" language. Brant v. Krilich held there is no reverse veil-piercing or forced foreclosure against LLC members, but that case involved a multi-member LLC — it doesn't resolve whether a single-member Indiana LLC gets the same result, and a 2013 bill (HB 1394) that would have added explicit exclusivity language was stripped out before passage. This is a real reason, beyond privacy, that owners layer a multi-member Wyoming parent above an Indiana operating LLC rather than relying on Indiana's own unsettled protection.

    Indiana requires no annual report — only a $32 Business Entity Report once every two years, due by the last day of the LLC's anniversary month in its second year. There is no Indiana franchise tax; pass-through income is taxed to members at Indiana's flat 2.95% rate (declining to 2.9% in 2027), plus a county income tax of 0.5% to 3.38%.

    State Agency & Filing Reference

    • Filing agency: Indiana Secretary of State — Business Services Division
    • Formation document: Articles of Organization ($95)
    • Standard processing time: the same business day for online filings through INBiz
    • Public entity search: bsd.sos.in.gov/PublicBusinessSearch

    Note: Confirm the $95 formation fee and $32 biennial Business Entity Report fee directly at inbiz.in.gov. Indiana's charging-order exclusivity question for single-member LLCs remains genuinely unresolved as of 2026 — treat it as an open question rather than settled protection in either direction, the same caution apps/LLA/data/states/single-member-llc/in.ts gives.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    No. Indiana's Articles of Organization require only the LLC's name, registered office address, and registered agent — no organizer, member, or manager name is required, and the biennial Business Entity Report that follows makes governing-person disclosure optional too.

    Indiana's own filing already keeps every name off the public record, so no formation-service workaround is needed for the Articles themselves. A Wyoming holding LLC as the member on your (non-public) operating agreement is used mainly for its stronger, settled charging-order protection rather than for name privacy Indiana already provides.

    It's genuinely unclear. IC 23-18-6-7 doesn't contain exclusive-remedy language, and the leading case, Brant v. Krilich (2005), addressed only a multi-member LLC. No Indiana court or statute has directly resolved whether a single-member LLC's charging order is truly exclusive, which is why a multi-member Wyoming parent is often used above an Indiana subsidiary.

    Bottom line: Indiana already keeps every name off its public filing, so a Wyoming parent here is primarily an asset-protection move — addressing a genuinely unresolved charging-order question that Indiana's own statute and case law don't settle.

    Start My Indiana LLC With a Wyoming Holding Parent — Starting at $99Start Your Business

    Related Reading